๐‘๐จ๐๐ซ๐ขฬ๐ ๐ฎ๐ž๐ณ ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐•๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ณ๐ฎ๐ž๐ฅ๐šโ€™๐ฌ โ€œ๐ˆ๐ซ๐ซ๐ž๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ญ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐žโ€ ๐‚๐ฅ๐š๐ข๐ฆ ๐ญ๐จ ๐„๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐›๐จ ๐€๐ฆ๐ข๐ ๐ˆ๐‚๐‰ ๐“๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ

Venezuelaโ€™s interim Head of State, Delcy Rodrรญguez, has forcefully reaffirmed Caracasโ€™ claim to Guyanaโ€™s Essequibo region, declaring that Venezuelaโ€™s โ€œrightsโ€ to the territory are โ€œhistorical and irrefutable,โ€ even as the matter remains before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Speaking Tuesday in Caracas at a Pilgrimage Against Sanctions event, Rodrรญguez dismissed criticism surrounding a brooch she wore during recent visits to Barbados and Grenada, which appeared to depict Essequibo as part of Venezuela.
โ€œThat is the only map I have known my entire life,โ€ she said, questioning whether Venezuelaโ€™s history books should now be โ€œburnedโ€ in response to objections raised by Guyanese authorities.
Rodrรญguez insisted that Venezuela would soon present its case again before the ICJ, grounding its position in what she described as โ€œinternational legalityโ€ and the 1966 Geneva Agreement. โ€œThereโ€™s no way weโ€™re going to allow a dispossession or legitimize a theft,โ€ she stated.
Her remarks signal a renewed hardening of Venezuelaโ€™s posture on the decades-old border controversy, even as her administration has recently adopted a more conciliatory tone toward the United States following the January 2025 ousting of Nicolรกs Maduro.
Ali Condemns โ€œProvocative Symbolismโ€
President Irfaan Ali, in a formal communication to CARICOM Chairman Dr. Terrence Drew, sharply criticised Rodrรญguezโ€™s use of the disputed map during official regional engagements.
He warned that such displays risk creating the perception of regional acquiescence to Venezuelaโ€™s claim and undermine the integrity of CARICOM platforms.
โ€œThis is not a matter of symbolism alone,โ€ Ali wrote. โ€œIt is a calculated and provocative assertion of a claim that Guyana has consistently and lawfully rejected, and which is before the International Court of Justice for final adjudication.โ€
Ali stressed that with the case actively before the ICJ, Venezuela should refrain from actions that attempt to โ€œnormaliseโ€ its claim through unofficial symbols, maps, or public displays.
He further called on all states to respect international law and avoid conduct that could inflame tensions or prejudice the judicial process.
Caracas Pushes Back
Venezuelaโ€™s Foreign Affairs Minister Yvรกn Gil dismissed Aliโ€™s concerns as โ€œunusualโ€ and accused the Guyanese leader of political theatrics.
โ€œIs he going to ban maps, history books, or any symbols he is uncomfortable with?โ€ Gil wrote on social media, defending the brooch as a representation of Venezuelaโ€™s historical narrative.
He characterized Guyanaโ€™s objections as โ€œnoiseโ€ and โ€œdrama,โ€ asserting that Venezuelaโ€™s territorial claim remains unchanged. โ€œVenezuelaโ€™s sun rises in the Essequibo,โ€ he declared.
A Dispute Rooted in History
The controversy over the Essequibo regionโ€”comprising roughly two-thirds of Guyanaโ€™s landmassโ€”dates back to the 1899 Arbitral Award, which definitively established the boundary between Venezuela and then-British Guiana.
Venezuela has long rejected that ruling as invalid, reviving its claim in the 1960s as Guyana approached independence. The 1966 Geneva Agreement established a framework for resolving the controversy, but no settlement has been reached.
Tensions escalated in 2023 when then-President Maduro unveiled a new Venezuelan map incorporating Essequibo and appointed a governor for the territory, drawing widespread international condemnation.
The dispute is now before the ICJ, where Guyana seeks final confirmation of the 1899 boundary.
Regional and International Stakes
The controversy has intensified amid growing geopolitical pressure in the region, including increased U.S. military activity in the Caribbean and warnings against any Venezuelan attempt to assert its claim by force.
Rodrรญguezโ€™s latest statements suggest that despite recent diplomatic recalibrations, Caracas is unwilling to soften its position on Essequiboโ€”keeping the territorial dispute at the forefront of regional tensions.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ-๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ,๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ.โ€” โœฆ

๐‹๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐๐ž๐ฒ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐‡๐ข๐ฌ ๐Œ๐ž๐š๐ง๐ฌ? ๐‚๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐‘๐š๐ข๐ฌ๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ ๐…๐ฅ๐š๐ ๐ฌ ๐Ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ

๐ˆ๐ง๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐Œ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐–๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐“๐จ ๐Š๐ง๐จ๐ฐ ??
Serious and deeply troubling allegations are mounting against a traffic inspector stationed at Vreed-en-Hoop ,on the West Coast with multiple complaints pointing to what appears to be a stark disconnect between public service income and a visibly extravagant lifestyle.
Reports describe access to several high-end vehicles and a residence that, by all accounts, rivals or exceeds those of far more senior ranks within the Guyana Police Force. For a serving officer, this raises unavoidable and legitimate questionsโ€”questions that cannot simply be brushed aside or ignored.
But the concern does not end with appearances.
Public transport operatorsโ€”minibus drivers and taxi operators trying to earn an honest livingโ€”are alleging what they describe as relentless and heavy-handed targeting. Vehicles reportedly clamped the moment they stop for passengers, enforcement actions carried out with unusual intensity, and a pattern that many say feels less like policing and more like pressure.
At the same time, allegations have surfaced suggesting that those in the officerโ€™s immediate circle may not be subjected to the same level of scrutiny or enforcementโ€”fueling perceptions of selective policing and abuse of authority.
These are not minor complaints. These are allegations that strike at the very core of fairness, integrity, and public trust in law enforcement.
Let us be clear: these claims remain unproven at this stage. However, the volume, consistency, and seriousness of the reports demand urgent and uncompromising scrutiny.
We are calling on the Police Service Commission, the Office of Professional Responsibility, and all relevant anti-corruption bodies to immediately initiate a thorough and transparent investigation into these matters. Silence or inaction will only deepen public suspicion and erode confidence in the system.
If these allegations are unfounded, let that be established swiftly and publicly. But if there is any truth to them, then decisive action must followโ€”without fear or favor.
The public is watching. And they are demanding answers.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ-๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ,๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ.โ€” โœฆโ€”

๐†๐จ๐ฏโ€™๐ญ ๐Œ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐„๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ก ๐…๐จ๐ซ๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐œ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ ๐”๐ง๐ข๐ญ โ€” ๐€ ๐’๐ญ๐ž๐ฉ ๐…๐จ๐ซ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐’๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐…๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐’๐ก๐จ๐ซ๐ญ

The Governmentโ€™s plan to establish a dedicated forensic interview (FI) unit for child abuse victims signals a long-overdue acknowledgment of systemic gaps in the protection of vulnerable children. Human Services and Social Security Minister, Dr Vindhya Persaud, announced the initiative as part of a broader strategy to improve response time and access in abuse cases.
At present, forensic interviews โ€” a critical component in securing evidence and protecting victims โ€” are conducted by non-governmental organisations such as ChildLink and Blossoms Inc., with support from the Child Protection Agency (CPA). The Stateโ€™s move to assume direct responsibility is, therefore, a welcome development.
However, while the creation of a forensic interview unit represents progress, it raises a deeper question: why has it taken this long, and why is the scope still so limited?
Forensic interviews are only one piece of a fractured system. The real deficiency lies in the absence of a fully integrated, dedicated investigative framework that follows each case from report to prosecution. As it stands, cases are passed between multiple actors โ€” Child Protection Officers, police, medical personnel, NGOs โ€” creating dangerous gaps where accountability can falter and critical evidence can be compromised.
A more effective model would see the establishment of a specialised investigative unit assigned to each case from the outset. That officer or team should be responsible for coordinating every stage โ€” from securing timely medical examinations to liaising with child protection services and ensuring case files are meticulously prepared for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
Without that continuity, the system remains vulnerable to the very breakdowns the Minister herself acknowledged: inconsistent reporting, delays, and poorly prepared case files that can determine whether justice is served or denied.
Dr Persaud rightly highlighted the importance of precision in case documentation, noting that โ€œwhat you write is how a case can go left or right.โ€ Yet this only underscores the urgency of structural reform. Training alone cannot fix a system where responsibility is fragmented and diffused.
Equally concerning is the ongoing shortage of Child Protection Officers, a limitation that continues to undermine even the most well-intentioned programmes, including the Rapid Response initiative. A single officer in a region is not a solution โ€” it is a stopgap.
The Governmentโ€™s planned digital tracking system is another positive step, promising greater oversight of case progression. But tracking failures after they occur is not a substitute for preventing them through cohesive case management.
Child abuse cases demand urgency, sensitivity, and above all, consistency. Victims cannot afford a system where responsibility is shared but accountability is unclear.
There is also a growing concern about the extent of ministerial involvement in operational oversight. While accountability is critical, the system cannot function efficiently if it is being micro-managed at the political level. The Ministerโ€™s role should be to establish policy, ensure resources are in place, and conduct periodic audits to assess performance โ€” not to track individual case movements or intervene in routine procedural matters. Effective child protection depends on empowering trained professionals to carry out their duties without undue interference, while holding them accountable through structured oversight mechanisms, not constant direct supervision.
If the Government is serious about reform, it must move beyond incremental fixes and commit to building a unified, end-to-end investigative mechanism โ€” one that eliminates gaps, assigns clear responsibility, and ensures that no childโ€™s case is left to drift between agencies.
Anything less risks perpetuating the very failures this new unit is intended to solve.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ-๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ,๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ.โ€” โœฆโ€”

โ€œ๐†๐š๐ซ๐›๐š๐ ๐ž ๐š๐ฌ ๐‚๐š๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ž๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข: ๐‡๐จ๐ฐ ๐…๐ข๐ฅ๐ญ๐ก ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐’๐ญ๐ซ๐ž๐ž๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ˆ๐ฌ ๐๐ž๐ข๐ง๐  ๐”๐ฌ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐”๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐œ๐ข๐ฅโ€

Something has changed on our streets: the garbage is no longer just a nuisanceโ€”itโ€™s everywhere, thick, inescapable, and suddenly impossible to ignore. Itโ€™s not just that people are a little sloppier; itโ€™s as if the city has been designed to look like a dump. This feels less like neglect and more like a deliberate, orchestrated spectacle.
Read it through the lens of Forbes Burnhamโ€™s thinking, and this is what he would call a casus belli: a manufactured provocation, carefully framed to justify a bigger political move. The PPPโ€‘led government allows enforcement to slacken, lets contractors and public agencies operate with impunity, and then lets the streets speak for them. The image of a filthy, โ€œbrokenโ€ city becomes the visual proof that the City Council is โ€œdysfunctionalโ€ and therefore unfit to govern.
The real purpose is obvious: to build a narrative that only the central government can โ€œfixโ€ the cityโ€”by taking control, stripping away autonomy, and expanding its own power. The garbage is not an accident or a coincidence; it is a political weapon, a slowโ€‘burn provocation meant to erode public confidence in local leadership.
When the streets are this visibly abused, the call for a โ€œstrong handโ€ from above starts to sound reasonable, even noble.
So when you see that pile of trash deliberately left at the corner, or those bags rotting on the sidewalk, donโ€™t just see lazinessโ€”see a casus belli in progress: a carefully staged crisis to justify a power grab over the City Council.

The Wales Watchdog Series: Part 111

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ $๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐—  “๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น”

๐—•๐—ฌ: ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฎ ๐—š๐—จ๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐—ก ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—œ๐—š๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—จ๐—ก๐—œ๐—ง
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—”๐—ง๐—˜๐—ž๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ฌ
If Part I exposed the contractor’s checkered past and Part II mapped the offshore shell games, Part III uncovers the most disturbing layer of the Gas-to-Energy (GtE) project:
The Inside Job. A project of this magnitude requires robust legal defense to protect the national interest. Instead, The 592 Guardian has found that the lines between the “Defender of the State” and the “Counsel for the Contractor” were not just blurredโ€”they were non-existent.
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ “๐——๐—ข๐—จ๐—•๐—Ÿ๐—˜ ๐—”๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง” ๐—”๐—ง๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฌ: ๐——๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—œ๐—ก๐——๐—ฅ๐—” ๐—ž๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ข๐—ก
At the center of this web sits Devindra Kissoon, the founding member of London House Chambers and the President of the American Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAM) Guyana. Our investigation into the UK “Paper Trail” and local High Court filings has confirmed a stunning conflict of interest that effectively “disarmed” the Government of Guyana (GoG) before negotiations even began.
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€:
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜‚๐—บโ€™๐˜€ ๐—”๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜: As early as 2021, Kissoon and his firm were retained by the CH4-Lindsayca network. London House Chambers publicly boasts of representing the consortium to “secure” the natural gas plant deal.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜‚๐—น๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜: Simultaneously, Kissoon has served as a prominent retained counsel for the Minister of Natural Resources and the state-owned Guyana Power and Light (GPL)โ€”the very entity that must buy the power Lindsayca produces.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—จ๐—ž ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: Our forensic look at ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐——๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ฌ๐—–๐—” ๐——๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฃ (๐—ข๐—–๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿด๐Ÿด๐Ÿฎ)โ€”the UK entity used to trigger the US$102M arbitrationโ€”shows it was registered on November 30, 2022. Kissoon, a UK-qualified barrister and “London House” principal, is alleged to have been instrumental in engineering this specific UK-based structure to “armor” the contractor against local Guyanese oversight.
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ “๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ”: ๐—” ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—š๐—š๐—˜๐—— ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—•๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก
The US$102.7 million loss wasn’t a failure of luck; it was a failure by design.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: Sources indicate that during the formation of the contract, Winston Brassington (Head of the GtE Taskforce) specifically requested that the contractors grant a “waiver” to allow Kissoon to provide the legal opinion on the arbitration venue and dispute resolution clauses.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—น๐˜:The GoG essentially allowed the contractor’s lawyer to help write the rules for how the contractor could sue the GoG.
When the contractor triggered the Dispute Adjudication Board (DAAB) using the UK-Guyana Treaty, the government found itself trapped in a legal framework it had paid its own “double agent” to build. The result? A US$102,679,839 bill that taxpayers are now paying in installments, while the legal minds behind the deal remain insulated by high-level political connections.
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—”๐— ๐—–๐—›๐—”๐—  ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ก๐—˜๐—˜๐—ฅ
By utilizing his position as AMCHAM President, Kissoon helped present the consortium as a “Tier-One American Engineering” powerhouse.
This polished, US-backed veneer effectively blinded Guyanese evaluators to the reality:that the entity was a debt-heavy vehicle with a history of FBI raids (via the CH4/Bellosta network) and shell-company maneuvers.
“๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜บ ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ง๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ, ๐˜ข ๐˜‰๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฉ ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฌ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ง๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ข ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ธ๐˜บ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜บ.”โ€” ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ, ๐— ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—”๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—จ๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐—กโ€™๐—ฆ ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—–๐—ง
The US$102M payout is the price of collusion. When the person advising the Ministry on how to protect the public purse is the same person advising the contractor on how to extract from it, the public loses every time. This was not a negotiation; it was a coordinated transfer of wealth.
This add-on to Part III serves as a “Financial Health Warning” for both local and diaspora investors. It unmasks the legal machinery that has turned a national project into a private enclave.
๐—”๐——๐——๐—˜๐—ก๐——๐—จ๐—  ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—œ๐—œ๐—œ: ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ž๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—ข๐—ข๐—ก ๐—–๐—›๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ก๐—œ๐—–๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฆ
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ “๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐˜†” ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜†
While the public sees Devindra Kissoon as a prominent attorney and the face of AMCHAM Guyana, The 592 Guardian has identified him as the “Master Key” that unlocks the Guyanese Treasury for the Lindsayca-CH4 consortium. His positioning is not merely a series of coincidences; it is a strategic occupation of every seat at the negotiating table.
1.๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ: ๐—” ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€ :To understand how the US$102.7M arbitration loss happened, one must look at the names on Kissoonโ€™s ledger. He is simultaneously:
โ€ข ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ:
Representing the Lindsayca-CH4 consortium during the inception of the GtE project.
โ€ข ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜†: Serving as the personal legal representative for Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo (the chief architect of the GtE project).
โ€ข ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: Providing legal services to Guyana Power and Light (GPL)โ€”the state entity forced to absorb the costs of the project’s delays.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜:
Operating as President of AMCHAM, where he “vets” incoming US and diaspora firms, effectively deciding who gets to play in the Wales arena.
2.๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ “๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—•๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ” ๐—ฃ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ: Our investigation has uncovered that the current Expressions of Interest (EOI) for the Fertilizer and Gas Bottling plants carry the same “DNA” as the original power plant deal.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜†: By incorporating these new entities as Private Companies rather than Public Corporations, Kissoonโ€™s legal framework ensures they are exempt from the Public Procurement Act.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ:This allows the government to bypass open competitive bidding and move directly to a “Preferred Bidder” status for Lindsaycaโ€”the same company currently holding the government hostage for an additional US$250M.
3.๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ% ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ: To the Guyanese Diaspora looking to “invest in home,” beware of the fine print. The EOI documentsโ€”reportedly structured under Kissoonโ€™s guidanceโ€”feature a 10% Guaranteed Annual Return.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ: This guarantee is not backed by the profits of the fertilizer plant (which doesn’t exist yet); it is backed by the Consolidated Fund.
โ€ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: If the project fails or the contractor (Lindsayca) mismanages the fundsโ€”as they have in the Dominican Republicโ€”the Guyanese taxpayer is legally obligated to pay the investors their 10%. You aren’t investing in a business; you are investing in a debt instrument that your own relatives in Guyana will have to pay back through taxes.
๐Ÿฐ. ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ “๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ”
We have confirmed through UK Companies House records that the registration of LINDSAYCA DEVELOPMENT LLP was a surgical strike. By placing the entity in a jurisdiction with a favorable treaty, Kissoon provided the contractor with a “legal armor” that our local Attorney Generalโ€™s chambers was either too incompetent or too complicit to challenge.
“๐˜๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ซ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ข ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ข ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ต. ๐˜๐˜ฏ ๐˜Ž๐˜ถ๐˜บ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ข, ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ข ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ.”โ€”
๐—˜๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ, ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฎ ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป
๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ง | ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—œ๐—ฉ: ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ข๐—œ
๐—˜๐—ซ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—˜๐——; ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ “๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—•๐—ผ๐˜…” ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€: How the US$340M Fertilizer and Gas Bottling Deals are Being Hidden from Public Scrutiny. We will break down the specific terms of the EOI and why the “Private Entity” status is a death knell for transparency.
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ดโ€”A side-by-side comparison of the failed DR project and the current Wales trajectory.
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฎ ๐—š๐—จ๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐—ก: ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ-๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต. ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜. ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฅ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐˜€, ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ โ€” ๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ, ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ.

๐’๐ž๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐œ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐‘๐ž๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ: ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‡๐ฒ๐ฉ๐จ๐œ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฒ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐†๐ฎ๐ฒ๐š๐ง๐šโ€™๐ฌ ๐…๐จ๐ซ๐ž๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ 

๐๐˜: ๐’๐ญ๐š๐Ÿ๐Ÿ-๐–๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐ซ
๐“๐‡๐„ ๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ—๐Ÿ ๐†๐”๐€๐‘๐ƒ๐ˆ๐€๐
Guyanaโ€™s Minister of Local Government, Priya Manickchand, has launched a scathing attack on CARICOM leaders for engaging Venezuelan official Delcy Rodrรญguez while she sported a brooch depicting the Essequibo as Venezuelan territory. Her outrage, framed around the sanctity of sovereignty and principle, isโ€”on the surfaceโ€”understandable. But it is also transparently selective, and that very selectivity strips her position of any remaining moral authority.
Minister Manickchand correctly declared that โ€œprinciple shouldnโ€™t be convenient.โ€ Yet, convenience has become the hallmark of this administrationโ€™s foreign policy. For decades, Cuba stood as a pillar of support for Guyana, providing critical medical expertise that our system relied upon. When the United States exerted pressure, Guyana turned its back on Havana, quietly terminating the Cuban Medical Brigade programme. Where was the public outcry regarding sovereignty and loyalty then? Apparently, principle only applies when it aligns with Washingtonโ€™s current geopolitical push.
This duplicity is echoed in the recent missive from President Irfaan Ali to the CARICOM Chairman, in which he essentially demands that regional partners calibrate their bilateral engagements to suit Guyanaโ€™s sensitivities. It is a bold, if not arrogant, demand for a government that has remained notably silent when other CARICOM nations were being penalized by external powers for failing to fall in line with US interests.
To demand unwavering solidarity from oneโ€™s neighbours while exercising cold, opportunistic flexibility at home is a contradiction that does not go unnoticed in regional capitals.
CARICOM is a community of sovereign nations, not an extension of Georgetownโ€™s foreign policy apparatus. Small island states, having navigated years of energy dependency through Petro-diplomacy, are being lectured by an administration that chose to align with Trinidad and Tobagoโ€”and by extension, Washingtonโ€”at the expense of regional cohesion.
The hypocrisy is even more glaring when one looks inward. The government insists that the world must respect Guyanaโ€™s sovereignty, yet it refuses to practice that same respect within our own borders. The Attorney General and the President have actively shunned the Leader of the Opposition, denying him a seat at the table to be properly apprised of the upcoming ICJ proceedings. If this administration cannot be bothered to build a unified national front at home, it has no business demanding that CARICOM leaders carry that burden for them abroad.
Sovereignty is not merely a slogan to be brandished at regional summits; it is a responsibility upheld through transparency and inclusion. By excluding domestic stakeholders, the government weakens the very cause it seeks to defend.
Venezuelaโ€™s provocative use of symbols is an attempt to project authority where it has none, and it certainly warrants objection. But let us be clear: this is not a loyalty test that Guyana is qualified to administer. You cannot outsource your own integrity.
President Ali and Minister Manickchand are currently posturing as defenders of the realm, yet their actions border on the very bullyism they claim to oppose. They demand from our neighbours a standard they refuse to hold themselves to, assuming that CARICOM will act as a subservient instrument of their selective outrage. They are mistaken.
Diplomacy in the Caribbean is a complex balancing act, and if Guyana wishes to command genuine support, it must stop demanding compliance and start leading with consistency.
๐™Ž๐™ค๐™ซ๐™š๐™ง๐™š๐™ž๐™œ๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™—๐™š๐™œ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™จ ๐™–๐™ฉ ๐™๐™ค๐™ข๐™š. ๐™„๐™› ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™˜๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฉ ๐™ง๐™š๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™จ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™ž๐™ฉ ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง ๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ฃ ๐™—๐™ค๐™ง๐™™๐™š๐™ง๐™จ, ๐™™๐™ค ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฉ ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง๐™จ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™™๐™ค ๐™ž๐™ฉ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™ฌ๐™ค๐™ง๐™ก๐™™ ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™œ๐™š.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ โ€” ๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ, ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ.

๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ญ ๐’๐ก๐จ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ ๐จ๐ซ ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ ๐‘๐ž๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ? ๐๐š๐ง๐๐ฅ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅโ€™๐ฌ ๐…๐ˆ๐ƒ๐ˆ๐‚ ๐…๐š๐œ๐š๐๐ž ๐‚๐š๐งโ€™๐ญ ๐‡๐ข๐๐ž ๐†๐ฎ๐ฒ๐š๐ง๐šโ€™๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐‘๐จ๐ญ

๐๐˜:๐’๐ญ๐š๐Ÿ๐Ÿ โ€” ๐–๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ž๐ซ
๐“๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ—๐Ÿ ๐†๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐๐ข๐š๐ง
In the glittering halls of the Grand Coastal Hotel, Attorney General Anil Nandlall, SC, preached the gospel of โ€œstronger contract systemsโ€ to a captive audience of engineers, lawyers, and procurement officers. The three-day FIDIC workshop, he declared, is part of a โ€œtransformation agendaโ€ to equip public servants for Guyanaโ€™s infrastructure boom. Contracts are being reviewed, performance bonds tightened, remedies sharpenedโ€”modern global standards to protect public coffers. Sounds impressive. Except itโ€™s the same tired script from a government addicted to announcements over action.
Nandlallโ€™s pitch lands flat against the backdrop of Guyanaโ€™s procurement scandals. Take the $100 million+ streetlights saga: 100,000 units promised nationwide, bids opened publicly at the National Procurement and Tender Administration (NPTAB) with 26 companies competing across four lots. Yet where are the audits? The geo-location checks proving lights actually work? The contractor performance reports? Public Works Minister Bishop Juan Edghill boasts 22,000 installed, but the trail goes coldโ€”no transparent milestone verifications, no public blacklist enforcement, no evidence that payments matched deliverables. This isnโ€™t weak contracts; itโ€™s weak wills.
๐“๐ก๐ž ๐๐ซ๐จ-๐‘๐ž๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ ๐‚๐š๐ฌ๐ž: ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ƒ๐จ ๐Œ๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐„๐ง๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก)
No one disputes that Guyanaโ€™s contract toolkit is archaic. Decades-old templates invite ambiguity, disputes, and delays. FIDIC standards could impose clearer notice requirements, robust performance securities, and efficient dispute resolutionโ€”tools to make breaches costlier and execution swifter. Training public officers to wield them might reduce the low-hanging fruit of incompetence. Nandlallโ€™s review of existing agreements aligns with President Aliโ€™s modernization rhetoric, and in theory, it could align Guyana with global best practices.
But theory evaporates under scrutiny. Strong contracts donโ€™t self-enforce. Blacklisted contractors morph into new shells via compliant proxies. Ministers โ€œrescueโ€ lagging projects by handing them to cronies over a rum punch. One firm scoops 10 contracts, capacity be damned, because the outcome was sealed long before bids hit the table. Nandlallโ€™s expedition fixes none of this. It polishes the facade while the rot festers in enforcement gaps and political discretion.
๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ ๐‚๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž๐ซ: ๐‡๐ฎ๐ฆ๐š๐ง ๐†๐ซ๐ž๐ž๐, ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐๐š๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ ๐–๐ž๐š๐ค๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ
Guyanaโ€™s procurement failures arenโ€™t born of flimsy legaleseโ€”they stem from a culture where easy money trumps accountability. The Public Procurement Commission (PPC) flags nothing on streetlights despite the red flags. No-bid whispers persist despite tender announcements. Algorithms for evaluation and awards? Now thatโ€™s a conversation worth having: automated scoring, beneficial ownership scans, real-time capacity checks, geo-tagged proofs of work. Remove the โ€œphone callโ€ discretion that predetermines winners.
Yet even algorithms need incorruptible inputs. Without public dashboards tracking bids, awards, variations, and audits, they become black boxes for favoritism. Nandlallโ€™s workshop ignores this. It trains officers but doesnโ€™t arm citizens with data to hold them accountable.
๐๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ž๐: ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ž ๐„๐ฑ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž๐
The 592 Guardian is watching. Every FIDIC-trained engineer, every reviewed contract, every โ€œmodernizedโ€ tender must now prove itself. Publish the streetlights contractor lists, payment schedules, and installation maps. Enforce the blacklists with teeth. Tie releases to verified geo-data and independent audits. Fail that, and this dog-and-pony show reveals itself as what it is: elite theater for a public footing the bill.
Guyana deserves systems that work, not sermons. Nandlall, the ballโ€™s in your court. Weโ€™re clued in, and weโ€™ll monitor every deliverable. Stingy enforcement wonโ€™t cut it anymore.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ ,
๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ, ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ. โ€” โœฆโ€”

๐๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ. ๐€๐ฅ๐ข -๐ง๐ž๐ฐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ, ๐๐ž๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ โ€“ ๐š ๐›๐ซ๐จ๐จ๐œ๐ก

๐๐˜: ๐†๐‡๐Š ๐‹๐€๐‹๐‹

My thinking was that Irfaan Ali, Guyanaโ€™s PhD president needed urgent help to make better use of his time. Searching for, locating, and dealing with the best people would assist him to prioritize, leave a lasting impression, eventually. I prefer being wrong; a president is involved. He jumped out; proved me right. About time mismanagement. A brooch, Dr. President? Is somebody kidding? Of all the matters crying for immediate attention, a brooch worn by Americaโ€™s Venezuelan presidential plant with Essequibo ingrained, is what sends Excellency Ali off, drives him to get in the face of CARICOM leaders? Knock me down; let me stay down there, please. Itโ€™s better to be at the bottom than have to deal with this type of, ah (er), genius now so popular in modern Guyana. Worth saying again, however painful: new PhDs lack past profoundness.
Former Venezuelan caudillo, Nicolo Maduro Doro, repeatedly called Guyanaโ€™s Irfaan Ali an imperialist stooge, and his PPP Govt an American puppet. Shades of the PPPโ€™s newest, closest friends, the Red Chinese. Neither he nor anybody in the PPP could generate a halfway hearty riposte. But Irfaan Ali is up the wall and going to the mat on some brooch. Of course, it is the symbolism, the bold-faced testing of the waters in the Venezuelan leaderโ€™s appalling audacity and arrogance. Aside: unless Americans put her up to that, so they can rush to Guyanaโ€™s side, emphasize the special friendship between the US-Guyana. America controls Guyana, dangles its leaders on a string. America suspends Venezuelan leaders by their neckties, and they still delight in sticking their tongues at GT and the PPP.
Now Pres Ali is on fire and he runs to some CARICOM leaders with sharp protests to convey his displeasure. He, a president, was labeled โ€œinsolentโ€ by the now jailed onetime Venezuelan badman, and what did Excellency Ali do? He settled for silence as his trusted companion. Clearly, there is some difficulty within PPP Govt camps in figuring out how to keep Pres. Ali focused, and maximizing returns from his scarce time. It was he himself who said in his first year, that heโ€™s a busy man, with a million matters managed all at once. But he is so sharp-eyed, and brilliantly advised, that he zeroes in a brooch and makes a big stink about it.
Venezuelan agents violate borders, shoot Guyanese soldiers, sack local communities, haul away spoils. The best that PPP Govt headmen have to offer is soft words, softer sticks, and the softest footsteps. But a miniscule, miserable, and maggot-like brooch is made into this monstrous apparition and existential concern. Is this PPP Govt a comedy or an effigy? When I first read of Senora Delcy Rodriguezโ€™s daring foreign adventure, while armed with a brooch, my reaction was if that is how she gets an adrenalin rush, then the gracious lady is best given wide berth, left to her antics. Civilized Guyanese know thatโ€™s exactly how one responds on encountering certain citizens on the street. People talking to themselves. People dressed in gaudy costumes, with bizarre ornaments completing intriguing dress codes.
Because I know how PPP leadership thinks, Dr. Aliโ€™s firefight over a fly is taking a sledgehammer to a snail. Much ado about the rambunctious and frivolous. At bottom, it is the PPP Govtโ€™s (and leadership) patented pattern of deflection. Distracting from the ruff stuff, covering up the tuff stuff. Like that US$2 billion gas project bacchanal. Pres Ali has studiously avoided addressing the gaping exposรฉs in that energy masquerade, and in Delcy Rodriguezโ€™s brooch he found the perfect distraction for gullible Guyanese. Recall the four-step recovery program developed by the PPP. Distort first. When that fails, deflect. Should that drop dead, then deny. And when all of those fall apart, then seek and destroy the messengers. Ali sealed his lips on the US$2 billion bag of tricks. Delcy Rodriguezโ€™s brooch pulled his lips apart.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ-๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ,๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ.โ€” โœฆ

Canadian Firm Moves to Develop Uranium Project Long Whispered About in Guyana

For decades, there have been quiet acknowledgmentsโ€”often denied, downplayed, or ignoredโ€”that Guyana sits atop uranium deposits. Today, those suspicions are no longer buried.
Canadian company U92 Energy Corp. has now formally advanced plans for a uranium project in Region Seven, effectively confirming what many in technical and mining circles have known but rarely stated openly: Guyana possesses commercially viable uranium resources.
The company disclosed that its Kurupung project spans approximately 92 square kilometres and is tied to a historical estimate of 20.6 million pounds of uranium. While U92 cautions that these figures are not yet compliant with current reporting standards, the scale is enough to place Guyana on the map of emerging uranium jurisdictions.
In its investor updates, U92 openly describes Guyana as a โ€œmining-friendlyโ€ territory supported by a pro-mining governmentโ€”language that signals confidence not just in the geology, but in the political environment surrounding extractive industries.
That openness marks a stark contrast to years of near silence around uranium. Unlike gold, bauxite, or now oil, uranium has remained a sensitive subject globally due to its strategic and security implications. Yet, with nuclear energy gaining renewed traction as part of the global clean energy transition, that silence is rapidly eroding.
The company is preparing to commence a 5,000-metre diamond drilling programme, with equipment already in-country and site preparations underway. Its goal is to update and expand the existing resource estimate by the second half of 2026.
Behind the scenes, technical teams are revisiting more than 129,000 metres of historical drilling dataโ€”further evidence that uranium exploration in Guyana is not new, but rather an old reality now stepping into public view.
What was once cautiously avoided in national discourse is now being positioned as an economic opportunity. The question going forward is not whether uranium exists in Guyana, but how transparentlyโ€”and responsiblyโ€”its development will be managed.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ-๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ,๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ.โ€” โœฆ

The Wales Watchdog Series: Part 1

๐—œ๐—ก๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ข๐——๐—จ๐—–๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก :
In the interest of transparency and national accountability, ๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ is embarking on the grueling task of unraveling the labyrinthine conundrum that has become the Gas-to-Energy project. What was birthed as a singular, unilateral visionโ€”a project declared the largest and most impactful in our nationโ€™s historyโ€”was inexplicably brought to life without the safeguards of a formal feasibility study. Even more alarming is the apparent absence of rigorous due diligence regarding the contractor, Lindsayca, whose checkered international record was seemingly overlooked. As the price tag balloons and the timelines shift, we are committed to deconstructing this complex web of financial maneuvers and procedural bypasses, ensuring that every Guyanese citizen is clued into the reality of how their future is being managed. We invite you to join us on this investigative journey as we demand the clarity and oversight that our treasury, and our people, deserve.
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐— ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—˜: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐— ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—ฃ๐—œ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐Ÿญ
In December 2022, the Government of Guyana (GoG) stood on the precipice of history, signing a $759 million USD contract with the Lindsayca-CH4 consortium. The promise was simple, yet seductive: a 300-megawatt power plant and Natural Gas Liquids (NGL) facility that would slash electricity costs by 50% by 2024.
But as the 2024 deadline crumbled, and as we stand in 2026 with a project total ballooning toward $1.1 billion USD, The 592 Guardian has pulled back the curtain on the โ€œinvestigative vacuumโ€ that allowed this deal to proceed. Our findings suggest that Lindsayca was never the โ€œenergy powerhouseโ€ advertised, but rather a master of the ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—– ๐— ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—นโ€”Pl operating on high debt, low transparency, and a history of litigation.
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ก๐—˜๐—ญ๐—จ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ก ๐—š๐—˜๐—ก๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฆ & ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—›๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ก ๐—›๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—Ÿ๐—˜
Lindsayca was born in 1995 as a family-owned engineering firm in Venezuela. When the brothers Hector and Jesus Fuentes Guimare moved operations to Houston in 2003, they didnโ€™t export a legacy of massive turbine construction; they exported a Rolodex.
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜€ ๐—œ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ:
โ€ข The Gazprom Precedent: Before landing in Guyana, Lindsayca was embroiled in a $43 million USD dispute in Texas with Russian giant Gazprom. The allegations? Over-invoicing and under-performance on a gas compression plant. The pattern of โ€œbilling for the unbuiltโ€ was established long before they touched Guyanese soil.
โ€ข The Debt Ratio: Independent financial audits from the 2016โ€“2019 periodโ€”available during the bidding processโ€”showed a company with staggering debt levels. Yet, the GoGโ€™s evaluation committee deemed them โ€œtechnically and financially soundโ€ over world-class bidders like Guycan (Daewoo/Mitsubishi).
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ ๐—š๐—”๐— ๐—˜: ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ โ€œ๐—ฅ๐——โ€ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ก๐—ก๐—˜๐—–๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก
Our investigation has tracked a sophisticated โ€œinternal procurementโ€ loop. Lindsayca Guyana Inc. has not been purchasing critical materials directly from manufacturers.
Instead, invoices obtained by The 592 Guardian show a circular flow of funds:
1. Guyanese Taxpayer Dollars are paid to Lindsayca Guyana.
2. Lindsayca Guyana โ€œpurchasesโ€ materials from Lindsayca RD SAS (a shell entity in the Dominican Republic).
3. Lindsayca RD SASโ€”owned by the same Fuentes brothersโ€”buys the materials with a massive markup, effectively โ€œround-trippingโ€ the profit into offshore accounts before a single turbine is fired.
โ€œThis isnโ€™t infrastructure; itโ€™s an extraction mechanism. They are self-supplying at a premium, then crying โ€˜insolvencyโ€™ to demand more money from the Guyanese treasury.โ€ โ€” Investigative Source, GTE Taskforce
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ก๐—–๐—˜: $๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿญ ๐—•๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—–๐—ข๐—จ๐—ก๐—ง๐—œ๐—ก๐—š
Today, the โ€œDeal of the Centuryโ€ has become a โ€œDebt of the Century.โ€ The math is cold and unforgiving:
โ€ข Original Bid: $759 Million
โ€ข Arbitration Loss (DAAB): $102.7 Million (Paid by you, the taxpayer, due to site-access failures).
โ€ข The New Demand: $250 Million (The current โ€œshakedownโ€ amount Lindsayca claims is needed to reach late 2026).
๐—ง๐—ข๐—ง๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—ง: $๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿญ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿญ,๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ,๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ ๐—จ๐—ฆ๐——
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—š๐—จ๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐—กโ€™๐—ฆ ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—–๐—ง
The lack of due diligence by the Government of Guyana was not an โ€œoversightโ€โ€”it was a systemic failure. By bypassing established giants with proven track records for a firm with โ€œshakyโ€ financials and a history of legal warfare, the state has placed our energy security in the hands of a contractor that thrives on delays.
As the private jets ferry executives between Houston, the DR, and Georgetown at a cost of $70,000 USD per week, the Guyanese citizen is left holding a utility bill that isnโ€™t shrinkingโ€”itโ€™s subsidizing a Venezuelan-owned shell game.
๐—˜๐——๐—œ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฅโ€™๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง๐—˜: ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ โ€œ๐—จ๐—ž ๐— ๐—”๐—ก๐—˜๐—จ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅโ€ & ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—จ๐—ฆ$๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐—  ๐—•๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฎ ๐—š๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป has uncovered a deliberate legal sequence that effectively โ€œarmoredโ€ the Gas-to-Energy (GtE) contractors against Guyanese oversight.
While the public was told this was an American-led project, the legal reality was engineered in the UK. On November 30, 2022โ€”just 14 days before the contract was signed in Georgetownโ€”the consortium registered ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ก๐——๐—ฆ๐—”๐—ฌ๐—–๐—”๐——๐—˜๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฃ๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—ฃ (๐—ข๐—–๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿด๐Ÿด๐Ÿฎ) in the United Kingdom. This was not a coincidence; it was a tactical deployment.
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ โ€œ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—นโ€:
โ€ข๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต๐Ÿด๐Ÿต ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ: By using a UK entity, the contractor successfully invoked the 1989 UK-Guyana Bilateral Investment Treaty. This allowed them to bypass our national courts and โ€œdragโ€ the government into international arbitration via the Dispute Adjudication/Avoidance Board (DAAB).
โ€ข๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—จ๐—ฆ$๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿณ ๐— ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜: As of January 2025, the DAAB ordered the Government of Guyana to pay the contractor a staggering US$102,679,839 for site handover delays and remediation. Despite government claims of โ€œconfidentiality,โ€ records show these paymentsโ€”equivalent to billions of Guyanese dollarsโ€”are already being siphoned from the Consolidated Fund in installments through 2026.
โ€ข๐—ญ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… :Because the entity is a UK Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), it operates as a โ€œtax-transparentโ€ vehicle. Combined with the UK-Guyana Double Taxation Agreement, the contractor is shielded from local withholding taxes. While Guyanese citizens fund the project, the profits are repatriated to Houston and London virtually tax-free.
๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ผ๐˜๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ: Our โ€œputting people firstโ€ administration signed a contract that allowed a foreign entity to use a British flag as a legal shield. As a result, Guyanese taxpayers are now paying a US$100 million penalty to a company that, by design, contributes nothing back to our national treasury in taxes.
This concludes the first segment of our investigative series.
๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ฌ ๐—ง๐—จ๐—ก๐—˜๐—— ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—œ๐—œ : The Double Agentsโ€”The Legal Architects and the $102M Poison Pill.
๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฎ ๐—š๐—จ๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐—ก: Hard-Truth. Investigative Report. Your Rights, Guarded.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ โ€” ๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ, ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ