“Kwakwani’s Floods: A Recurring Crisis Demanding a Permanent Solution”

/1 Comment/in , , /by

THE 592 GUARDIAN♦ ACCOUNTABILITY♦INTEGRITY

“Kwakwani’s Floods: A Recurring Crisis Demanding a Permanent Solution”

Another flood season, another round of assurances, and once again the people of Kwakwani find themselves navigating rising waters, damaged homes, and disrupted livelihoods. The recent statements from Agriculture Minister Zulfikar Mustapha—that water levels are expected to recede as rainfall declines—may offer temporary comfort, but they do little to address a far more troubling reality: Kwakwani’s flooding is no longer an occasional crisis. It is a predictable, recurring event.

For decades, the community has endured seasonal inundation driven by heavy rainfall, overtopping of the Berbice River, and tidal influences. What was once described as a phenomenon occurring every ten years has now evolved into a far more frequent cycle, exacerbated by climate change and environmental shifts. Yet, despite this well-documented pattern, the national response remains largely reactive—mobilizing relief supplies, conducting assessments, and waiting for waters to recede.

This cycle is not just environmentally unsustainable; it is fiscally irresponsible.

Each flood event triggers a cascade of public expenditure: emergency response deployment, infrastructure repair, drainage interventions, and social assistance. Beneath these visible costs lie deeper, less quantified burdens—lost income, disrupted education, health risks, and the psychological toll on affected families. In effect, the State is repeatedly paying to manage a problem it already understands, without committing to a permanent solution.

The question therefore arises: at what point does recurring expenditure outweigh the cost of decisive intervention?

Successive administrations have long acknowledged Kwakwani’s vulnerability. As far back as 2006, efforts were initiated to relocate residents from flood-prone waterfront areas to higher ground. Yet, nearly two decades later, that initiative remains incomplete, underutilized, and largely ineffective. The reasons are not difficult to identify—insufficient incentives, weak planning, limited infrastructure, and a failure to align relocation with the economic realities of residents whose livelihoods are tied to the river.

But these challenges do not justify inaction. They demand better policy design.

A modern, responsible approach to Kwakwani must move beyond short-term relief and toward a structured, long-term resilience strategy. This requires a holistic framework grounded in three key pillars.

First, the government must pursue a voluntary but incentivized relocation programme. This means more than allocating land—it requires fully serviced housing schemes, secure land titles, and financial support mechanisms that make relocation both viable and attractive. Residents cannot be expected to abandon their homes for uncertainty.

Second, any relocation effort must be accompanied by livelihood transition planning. Economic displacement is one of the primary barriers to resettlement. Ensuring access to transportation, markets, and alternative income opportunities is critical if relocation is to succeed. Without this, relocation efforts will continue to face resistance.

Third, there must be targeted investment in resilient infrastructure. Not all areas can or should be abandoned. Strategic flood defenses, improved drainage systems, and climate-adaptive planning are essential to protect critical assets and reduce vulnerability where relocation is not feasible.

Equally important is the enforcement of land-use policies to prevent further expansion into high-risk zones. It is counterproductive to relocate some residents while allowing others to settle in the same vulnerable areas.

 

The situation in Kwakwani is not unique. It is emblematic of a broader governance challenge in Guyana—where known risks are repeatedly managed rather than resolved. In an era of increasing climate uncertainty, this approach is no longer tenable.

If the government is serious about protecting citizens and managing public resources responsibly, it must shift from a reactive posture to a proactive strategy. The science is known. The risks are clear. The costs—both human and financial—are mounting.

Kwakwani does not need another promise that floodwaters will recede. It needs a plan to ensure that when they do, they do not return with the same devastating regularity

.Recurring floods should not mean recurring failure.

 

HEALTH ADVISORY

/0 Comments/in /by

Saharan Dust Event Expected

The Ministry of Health advises the public that an influx of Saharan dust is expected to affect air quality across the country.

Residents are urged to take the necessary precautions to minimize exposure and reduce the risk of dust-related health complications. Individuals should remain indoors as much as possible, particularly during periods of high dust concentration. Those who must venture outside are encouraged to wear appropriate face coverings.

Persons with asthma, allergies, or other respiratory conditions should ensure that their medications are readily available and used as prescribed. Increased fluid intake is also recommended to help maintain respiratory health.
The Ministry continues to monitor the situation and will provide updates as necessary.

Stay safe. Protect your health.

“Healthy Hearts, Failing System: Guyana’s Young Are Dying Because No One Is Being Held Accountable”

/0 Comments/in , /by

BY: Hem Kumar                               

𝙏𝙝𝙚 592 𝙂𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣

Guyana cannot keep shrugging off the mounting toll of cardiovascular disease as an unavoidable medical fact. In a small population where every death ripples through families and communities, the rising number of young people collapsing with heart attacks, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and premature coronary artery disease is not a statistic to recite—it is a national failure to act. The latest Cardiology Symposium at the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation (GPHC) did not just present new data; it laid bare a brutal contradiction: the country knows how to prevent these deaths, yet continues to allow them anyway.

Heart disease has long been among Guyana’s leading causes of death, claiming over 2,000 lives a year, with more than half tied to coronary artery disease. Yet what is new—and deeply alarming—is that many of those dying are no longer the elderly. They are young adults, often in their most productive years, arriving at hospitals with conditions that should have been managed years before. One cardiologist at the symposium noted that young Guyanese are now presenting with hypertension, diabetes, obesity, arrhythmias, and premature coronary artery disease at rates that would be considered unacceptable in any functioning health system. When the system tolerates this, it is not failing by accident; it is failing by default.

The real scandal is that heart disease is largely preventable. The risk factors are well known: poor diet, physical inactivity, smoking, uncontrolled blood pressure and diabetes, and high cholesterol, worsened by stress and poverty. The tools for early detection—blood pressure checks, glucose screening, lipid profiles, and even advanced diagnostics like coronary calcium scoring—are available, at least in pockets. What is missing is not knowledge, or even goodwill, but consistent, system‑wide enforcement of prevention as a national priority. In a country that talks about development while losing thousands to a disease that rarely strikes the healthy, prevention cannot remain at the margins of the agenda.

Yet prevention is consistently treated as optional. Patients arrive too late, too sick, and too often already in crisis because the primary‑care layer is weak, under‑staffed, and poorly coordinated. Follow‑up is patchy, referrals are delayed, and continuity of care is sacrificed for convenience, bureaucracy, and silence. The result is that many Guyanese still see a doctor only when they collapse, not when they feel “off.” That culture is not created by citizens alone; it is shaped by a system that has normalised late‑stage intervention instead of structured, early‑stage prevention.

Health leadership must be held to a higher standard. If the Ministry of Health and the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation can mobilise conferences, symposiums, and media events, they must also mobilise performance indicators that track how many people are screened, how many high‑risk patients are identified, how many are actually brought into treatment and follow‑up. The public is tired of hearing that “heart disease is a leading cause of death” and “we must do more prevention.” Those phrases ring hollow when the same officials return year after year to repeat the same tone of alarm without measurable change.

The growing burden among younger populations only intensifies this duty. When young Guyanese die suddenly or with advanced coronary disease, it is not just a tragedy for their families; it is an economic and social loss for the nation. These are students, workers, caregivers, and future leaders—cut down not by some mysterious plague, but by a disease that can be delayed, mitigated, and often avoided. To allow that to continue is to accept a weaker workforce, heavier household burdens, and an over‑stretched health system that should never be treating preventable heart attacks as routine.

Accountability also means confronting unevenness across the system. Rural and remote communities, as well as certain ethnic groups with higher prevalence of coronary disease, often face greater barriers to screening, treatment, and specialist care. If the Ministry of Health is serious about equity, it must track and correct these disparities, rather than assuming that building more hospitals in Georgetown automatically solves the problem elsewhere. Prevention is not just about drugs and machines; it is about accessible clinics, trained nurses and community health workers, and outreach that reaches people where they live.

The public must also be engaged differently. Awareness campaigns that last a day or a week are not enough. Guyana needs sustained, community‑level education that explains, in simple language, when to test, what to watch for, and where to go before a crisis. Nutritionists and doctors at the symposium rightly emphasised healthy eating, exercise, smoking cessation, and weight management; but those messages must be backed by policies that make healthy choices easier—affordable fruits and vegetables, limits on trans fats and salt, and stronger tobacco control.

In short, Guyana cannot afford to keep absorbing a steady stream of preventable heart deaths while the same institutions repeat the same warnings. The country is too small, the population too vulnerable, and the cost of inaction too high. Those tasked with the mandate must be held accountable for delivering fewer avoidable deaths, earlier detection, and better follow‑up—not just for holding conferences about the problem.

Healthy hearts are not a luxury; they are the foundation of a healthy nation. If the leadership will not act for that, it must at least answer to those who will.

𝙏𝙝𝙚 592 𝙂𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣-𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 , 𝘼𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮, 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙄𝙣 𝙂𝙪𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙖 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨. —✦—