Luxury Lies, Missing Millions: How Guyana’s Tax System Was Gamed Again

BY: Hem Kumar 

𝙏𝙝𝙚 592 𝙂𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣

Another day, another gut-punch to the Guyanese taxpayer—and this time, the stench of elite privilege and systemic failure is impossible to ignore.

Information now in the public domain reveals that the Guyana Revenue Authority (GRA) may have been fleeced of hundreds of millions of dollars in unpaid taxes tied to the importation of three high-end luxury vehicles by a prominent attorney, Devindra Kissoon, a founding member of the London House Chambers.

This is not a story about success or wealth. It is a story about manipulation, apparent deception, and a tax system that continues to bend for the powerful while squeezing the ordinary citizen.
Start with the most recent transaction.

In January 2025, a Lamborghini Urus—one of the most recognisable luxury SUVs in the world—was imported and declared at a value of just GY$22.5 million, roughly US$107,000. Globally, that same vehicle commands between US$240,000 and US$280,000. That is not a minor discrepancy. That is a brazen undervaluation that effectively slashes the government’s rightful tax intake by tens of millions of dollars.

And this was no isolated incident.
In April 2024, a Porsche sports car was declared at a laughable GY$4.7 million—just over US$22,000. That figure would barely secure a used economy vehicle, far less a high-performance German machine with a market value starting around US$135,000.

Then there is the 2021 importation of a Mercedes-Benz GLE 350, declared at GY$9.3 million (US$44,000). While less outrageous on paper, it fits a now unmistakable pattern: luxury vehicles, consistently undervalued, systematically eroding the country’s tax base.

This is not coincidence. This is a method.

And the most disturbing question remains unanswered: how did these declarations pass through the GRA without triggering red flags, audits, or enforcement action?
Because here lies the deeper crisis—not just individual conduct, but institutional weakness.

When a school teacher, a vendor, or a small business owner falls short on taxes, the system moves swiftly and decisively. Penalties are imposed. Licenses are threatened. Compliance is enforced.
But when the elite manipulate invoices and shave millions off import values, the system appears to fall silent.

This is the very definition of a two-tiered society.

Even more troubling is the eerie resemblance to the Azruddin Mohamed scandal, where luxury vehicles were similarly undervalued, and where political proximity blurred the lines between governance and favouritism. In that case, the country was rocked by revelations of a staggering $1.2 billion in unpaid taxes, alongside claims of direct communication with the Head of State regarding reduced tax payments.

Different actors. Same playbook.
Guyana cannot continue down this road.

Every dollar lost through tax evasion is a dollar stolen from public development—schools left unfinished, hospitals under-equipped, roads riddled with neglect. These are not abstract losses. They are real consequences borne by citizens who play by the rules.

The GRA must answer.
Were these valuations independently verified?

Were internal controls bypassed or compromised?

Who approved these declarations?
And most importantly—will there be consequences?

Because without accountability, this is not just a scandal. It is a signal.


A signal that in Guyana, wealth can purchase leniency, influence can silence scrutiny, and the law can be negotiated.

That is a dangerous precedent for any nation—especially one standing on the brink of unprecedented economic transformation.
If the institutions tasked with protecting public revenue cannot—or will not—act decisively, then they risk becoming complicit in the very corruption they are meant to prevent.

The Guyanese people deserve better.
And they are watching.

𝙏𝙝𝙚 592 𝙂𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣-𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 , 𝘼𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮,𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙄𝙣𝙂𝙪𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙖 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨.— ✦—

Applause Without Accountability: The Dangerous Rise of Political Cheerleading in Guyana

Halim Khan’s latest outpouring of praise for President Irfaan Ali reads less like an objective assessment and more like a rehearsed tribute designed to curry favour with power.

This is the same figure who once applauded the President’s “visionary leadership” while merely observing the construction of Joe Vieira Park—hardly the mark of transformative governance. Now, he reappears, once again cloaking routine political engagement in grandiose language about global recognition and economic destiny.

Let’s be clear: calling an award “proof” of national transformation does not make it so. These pronouncements are not grounded in scrutiny or accountability, but in a pattern of uncritical endorsement that does little to serve the public interest. It is political flattery dressed up as private sector commentary.

At a time when Guyanese citizens are demanding transparency, measurable outcomes, and equitable development, this kind of rhetoric is not just hollow—it is misleading. It attempts to manufacture a narrative of success while sidestepping the real questions about governance, distribution of wealth, and long-term sustainability.

The private sector has a responsibility to speak truth to power, not echo it. When business leaders choose applause over accountability, they abandon that duty and weaken the very credibility they depend on.
Guyana deserves honest voices, not cheerleaders.

𝙏𝙝𝙚 592 𝙂𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣-𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 , 𝘼𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮, 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙄𝙣 𝙂𝙪𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙖 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨.— ✦—

How taxpayers paid for relief — and got burden instead

BY: Hem Kumar 

𝙏𝙝𝙚 592 𝙂𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣

Royal Chicken and its consortium benefitted from state-backed land and infrastructure meant to lower feed costs and reduce food prices. Instead, the public now faces imported concessions, local exports, and no meaningful relief at the checkout line.
The Royal Chicken arrangement is a textbook example of how public power can be used to manufacture private advantage while ordinary citizens are left to carry the cost.
What was presented to the Guyanese people as a bold agricultural solution was supposed to do several things at once: build local soya and corn production, reduce dependence on imports, lower feed costs, support farmers, and eventually bring down the price of chicken and eggs. To make that happen, taxpayers helped fund the land, the roads, the silos, the wharf, and the wider infrastructure needed to sustain the project.
That was the promise. Relief.
But the reality now emerging is deeply troubling.
Royal Chicken is still reportedly receiving duty-free concessions for feedstock imports, even as the consortium tied to that taxpayer-supported venture is exporting locally grown product that was supposed to help meet domestic needs. In plain terms, the public financed a system designed to reduce costs, but the same system appears to be allowing the same players to import tax-free and export for profit at the same time.
That means the people have been made to pay twice.
First, they paid through taxes that helped build the infrastructure and support the venture. Then they paid again in the market, where food prices remain high and the promised relief has not materialized. The burden never went away; it was simply shifted onto the backs of consumers.
This is not a small administrative mistake. It is a serious abuse of public trust.
A handful of dominant operators appear to benefit from every side of the arrangement: public land, public infrastructure, import concessions, and market control. Meanwhile, small farmers continue to struggle with high production costs, and ordinary households continue to face expensive chicken and eggs. The people who were supposed to benefit from the policy are the very people still paying the price for its failure.
If the goal was self-sufficiency, why are imports still being subsidized? If the goal was lower prices, why is the consumer still suffering? If the goal was to strengthen local production, why is local output being exported while domestic demand remains under pressure?
Those questions go to the heart of the matter. This is not simply about feedstock. It is about whether state policy is being used to serve the public interest or to protect a privileged few.
The greatest insult is that the public was sold a story of relief, development, and national benefit. Instead, it appears to have received a system where taxpayers underwrote the infrastructure, subsidized the imports, and still did not receive affordable food in return.
That is why this issue has cut so deeply. It is not just a policy failure. It is a warning about what happens when public resources are captured by private interests under the banner of development.
The result is brutally simple: the people paid for the relief, and then they were left subsidizing the very arrangement that denied it to them.

𝙏𝙝𝙚 592 𝙂𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣-𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 , 𝘼𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮,𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙄𝙣𝙂𝙪𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙖 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨.— ✦—

CANU’s Anti-Drug Booklet Initiative a Step Forward, But Questions Remain on Impact

GEORGETOWN, GUYANA — The Customs Anti-Narcotic Unit (CANU) has launched a new anti-drug booklet series aimed at raising public awareness about the dangers of drug use and trafficking, particularly among young people and vulnerable communities.
According to the Department of Public Information (DPI), the initiative forms part of ongoing national efforts to address substance abuse through education. CANU Director James Singh stated that the programme is intended to provide “accurate and accessible information” to help citizens make informed decisions.
While the distribution of educational materials in schools and communities is a welcome step, the effectiveness of such initiatives has long depended on sustained engagement, measurable outcomes, and integration with broader social interventions. Guyana continues to face complex challenges linked to drug trafficking and substance abuse, raising questions about whether public awareness campaigns alone can meaningfully curb the problem.
The booklet series will be rolled out nationwide through schools, community programmes, and public outreach efforts. However, stakeholders will be watching closely to see whether this initiative is supported by long-term strategies, including rehabilitation services, enforcement strengthening, and community-based interventions.

Government responds to Fire at Apaiqua Landing Region Seven

Apaiqua Landing, Mazaruni River – The Government of Guyana, under the direction of His Excellency President Dr. Mohamed Irfaan Ali, has mobilized an immediate response following a devastating fire at Apaiqua Landing, Region Seven, on the evening of May 8, 2026.
Minister of Natural Resources, Hon. Vickram Bharrat, and Minister of Home Affairs, Hon. Oneidge Walrond, are currently on the ground engaging affected residents and assessing the extent of the damage.

Preliminary reports indicate that nine buildings were destroyed, leaving more than twenty persons displaced. The Government extends its deepest sympathies to the families and business owners impacted by this unfortunate incident.
Efforts are underway to provide urgent assistance and support to those affected. Relevant agencies are actively coordinating relief measures while investigations continue to determine the cause of the fire.

The Government remains committed to ensuring that all necessary resources are deployed to assist the affected community during this difficult time.

Barbados Calls for Stronger Caribbean Cooperation on Migration and Workforce Development

Barbados is urging Caribbean nations to strengthen regional cooperation on migration and labor movement as leaders continue to examine long-term economic sustainability across the region.

Speaking during discussions at the United Nations International Migration Review Forum, Barbados Minister of Home Affairs Gregory Nicholls emphasized that migration is no longer simply a social issue, but a critical economic and developmental matter for small island states.

According to Nicholls, Caribbean countries must begin treating migration as part of a broader regional strategy tied to workforce development, economic growth, and resilience. He noted that many countries throughout the Caribbean continue to face labor shortages in sectors such as healthcare, construction, hospitality, and agriculture, while at the same time dealing with population shifts and emigration.

Barbados believes stronger collaboration within CARICOM could help create more balanced movement of skilled workers throughout the region. Officials argue that freer movement between Caribbean nations would not only benefit economies but also strengthen regional integration and cooperation at a time when global economic pressures continue to affect small developing states.

The issue has become increasingly important as several Caribbean countries attempt to modernize their economies while responding to changing migration trends, climate-related challenges, and growing international competition for skilled labor.

Regional leaders have also acknowledged that migration policies must be handled carefully to ensure social stability and economic fairness while still creating opportunities for Caribbean citizens to work and contribute across borders.

The discussions are expected to continue as CARICOM governments push for deeper regional collaboration and more unified policies on labor mobility and development.

Cocaine, Cash and Firepower: Major Bust Signals Deepening Narco Threat

Another major cocaine bust at Springlands has once again exposed the persistent and deeply troubling role Guyana continues to play in the global narcotics trade.
On Friday, the Customs Anti-Narcotic Unit (CANU) intercepted more than 45 kilogrammes of cocaine—packaged in 40 brick-like parcels—with an estimated European street value of €1.575 million (US$1.856 million). Two individuals have since been arrested. The operation also uncovered an Uzi firearm fitted with ammunition, a stark reminder of the dangerous convergence between drug trafficking and organized violence.

Authorities confirmed that the shipment was destined for Europe, reinforcing a now-familiar pattern: Guyana as a transshipment point in a lucrative and far-reaching international drug network. While CANU has emphasized that the drugs carry a comparatively modest local street value of approximately GY$50 million, the near US$2 million valuation abroad underscores the high stakes driving these operations.

CANU has credited intelligence-led operations and regional cooperation for the successful seizure. While such efforts are commendable, they also raise urgent questions about the scale and sophistication of trafficking networks operating within Guyana’s borders. Each high-profile bust signals not only enforcement success, but also the troubling volume of narcotics that may be slipping through undetected.
Equally concerning is the presence of a high-powered firearm alongside the narcotics cache. This is not incidental. It reflects the militarization of criminal enterprises and the growing threat posed to community safety, particularly in border regions like Corentyne.

Guyana is to meaningfully disrupt its role in transnational drug trafficking, enforcement alone will not suffice. Sustained intelligence coordination, tighter border controls, and deeper institutional accountability must become the norm rather than the exception.

Otherwise, these periodic seizures—however significant—risk becoming little more than snapshots of a much larger, largely unseen crisis.

A suspect was shot and injured

A suspect was shot and injured on Friday evening after allegedly robbing a money changer of GY$200,000 along America Street, according to the Guyana Police Force.
Preliminary reports indicate that the money changer, who is a licensed firearm holder, discharged his weapon during the incident, injuring one of the suspects. The wounded individual has since been apprehended and transported to a medical facility, where he is receiving treatment under police guard.
Law enforcement officials have confirmed that efforts are ongoing to locate and apprehend a second suspect believed to be involved in the robbery.
As of late Friday night, crime scene investigators remained on site within a secured perimeter, processing evidence and gathering information to support the investigation. The money changer was also escorted to the location to assist detectives.
The Guyana Police Force has assured that investigations are ongoing and further updates will be provided as more information becomes available.

Accountability on the Global Stage

The legal proceedings at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) continue to highlight the historical complexities of the Guyana-Venezuela border dispute. Attorney Paul Reichler points to a long-standing pattern of obstruction, noting that Venezuela’s rejection of the 1899 award lacks legal grounding and has historically hindered Guyanese sovereignty.

As investigations into national interests and transparency continue, the outcome of this case remains a pivotal moment for regional stability and international law.

#ICJ #Guyana #Venezuela #InternationalLaw #Sovereignty #PublicRecord

Press Freedom: fears, limitations and more fears.

BY:GHK Lall.

Press freedom in Guyana is once again in the headlines, the consciousness of Guyanese.  It’s time to raise the cudgelsseveral decibels.  Now that the World Press Freedom Index highlights Guyana’s continued slide into disrepute, the call is for another look, more inquiries.  I reverse, then come forward.

During his first turn at the wheel, it was Pres Ali who immersed himself in political sanctimonies, while railing against criticism.  Naysayers, media protestors, constitutionally-inspired conscientious objectors and others he deemed undesirable soothsayers all came in for heavy condemnation.  In Ali’s telling, he was all for criticism, but only on the condition that it falls within the perimeters of what he termed ‘constructive criticism.’  I asked then, ask again: by what divine right of presidents did Excellency Ali seize for himself the moral authority to impinge on what acceptable criticism is, is not, andshould be?  To spotlight the president some more, expose his frailty (his fallacy) longer, by what fig leaf of his imagination, by what token of intellectual gravitas, did he conjure what’s‘constructive criticism?’  And, what made he, Irfaan Ali (PhD), the sole authority thereto?

Thereafter, the die was cast, hatchets brandished, messages communicated.  It was open season on citizens exercising freedom of thought, freedom of belief (political not religious), freedom of expression, and freedom to express such in every channel in this society, whether private enterprise, or publiclybacked.  When State media doors were slammed harder, sealed tighter, in the face of those who fell into one of Ali’s colorful denunciations, hunting season flourished.  Victims bagged,hogtied from head-to-toe.  Though unexpected, it didn’t surprise that a Stabroek News would be visited by the PPP Govt’s Grim Reaper.

First, there were vice presidential railing and ranting about coverage and commentary, though today he seeks cover under the cloud of climate change.  Then came the kiss of death, a Jagdeo special that manifested his totalitarian tendencies, and communistic love for total control: no chopping off of ads.  But eliminating, through clever non-dispersal of tens of millions in ad payments.  Was that a scheme that reeks of the Machiavellian, the politically sinister, or what?  Meanwhile, there were those individuals who spoke out being singled out for the PPP Govt’s Saturday Nite Special: a two-by-four to the skull.  One captain calling for the constructive; another far cleverer biding his time, while working feverishly, to deliver his coup de grace: no submission and cooperation, no consideration and no compassion.  Said more colloquially: no money. no love.  I am still trying to figure out the legal equation, the constitutional formula, that Minister of Law, Order, and PPP Justice, Mr. Anil Nandlall, employs as the basis for this overreach, the assassins’excesses.  Or why what is demanded for the PPP is denied to others.  How could it be that what the PPP claims as piety for itself is damned as heresy in others.  Another for Ali and Nandlall: Stabroek stopped.  Now stop social media.  Guyanese truckers crying against impoverishing Chinese invasions.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Ali-Jagdeo-Nandlall government insists that it cherishes press freedom, is a welcoming, comforting, lighthouse to press wanderers, media shipwrecked, and freedom’s outcasts.  It must be recalled that the Third Reich always insisted that the gods were on its side.  Some gods those must have been!  I sympathize withExcellency Ali, doctor of overstatement, and heavily overburdened worker.  But to give Lords of the Guyana Realm, Jagdeo and Nandlall, a pass, is asking too much.  If they’re ignorant, I help: the deeper the oppression, the stronger the conviction.  Conclusion: methinks that those who object to light and truth must be messengers of darkness, hypocrisies foremost heroes. Thus, press freedom, (freedom itself), falters, fades, in PPP Guyana.  if they don’t know, those who labored to narrow the boundaries of argument and dissent have invariably self-destructed.  Press freedoms, other freedoms, are matters of principle; neither leadership luxuries nor benevolence. 

𝙏𝙝𝙚 592 𝙂𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙣-𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 , 𝘼𝙘𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮,𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙄𝙣𝙂𝙪𝙮𝙖𝙣𝙖 𝘼𝙣𝙙 𝘾𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙗𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨.— ✦—