BY: Staffโ Writer
๐๐๐ 592 ๐๐ช๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฃ.
There is a particular kind of political lie that deserves special contempt. Not the lie of omission, where a man stays quiet about something uncomfortable. Not the lie of spin, where facts are bent and twisted until they resemble something more convenient. No โ the lie that deserves the harshest judgment is the deliberate, constructed, point-by-point denial. The kind where a man looks his country in the eye and says, with the full authority of his office: this did not happen.
That is what Prime Minister Mark Phillips did on April 7, 2026.
And when a leader lies about money โ specifically about where nearly one hundred million US dollars went, and why, and to whom โ the question this nation must demand an answer to is not merely whether he lied. The question is: what is he hiding?
The Anatomy of the Lie
There is a particular kind of political lie that deserves special contempt. Not the lie of omission, where a man stays quiet about something uncomfortable. Not the lie of spin, where facts are bent and twisted until they resemble something more convenient. No โ the lie that deserves the harshest judgment is the deliberate, constructed, point-by-point denial. The kind where a man looks his country in the eye and says, with the full authority of his office: this did not happen.
That is what Prime Minister Mark Phillips did on April 7, 2026.
And when a leader lies about money โ specifically about where nearly one hundred million US dollars went, and why, and to whom โ the question this nation must demand an answer to is not merely whether he lied. The question is: what is he hiding?
When Leaders Lie About Money, They Are Hiding Something
Let us state what should be obvious but is too often left unsaid in the polite language of political commentary: when elected officials lie about the movement of public money, they are not doing so out of embarrassment. They are not doing so because the truth is mildly inconvenient. Leaders lie about money because the truth about the money leads somewhere they do not want the public to go.
The question this nation must now ask โ loudly, persistently, and without apology โ is where does this particular truth lead?
A US$97 million settlement, reached quietly, on a project that has already ballooned past US$2 billion, does not materialize from nowhere. Settlements of this nature do not happen without months of negotiation, without legal teams, without approvals at the highest levels of government. Someone signed off. Someone knew. Multiple someones knew. And yet the Prime Minister of this country stood before the public and said: nothing happened.
Who authorized this settlement? At what point was the President informed? Was Cabinet consulted? Were the appropriate parliamentary committees notified โ as Phillips himself insisted they would be, when he declared all payments were โreported to parliamentโ? If that assurance was true, then parliament knew about a payment that the Prime Minister was simultaneously denying. If it was false, then parliament was also deceived. Either answer is damning.
And what precisely were the โsoil stabilisation worksโ and โdelay-related provisionsโ at the heart of this settlement? The Wales site has been a source of concern for engineers and observers since construction began. Soil stabilisation failures on a gas-to-energy project of this scale are not minor technical footnotes. They are red flags that go to the very foundations โ literally โ of whether this project is being built correctly, safely, and with the oversight that public infrastructure demands. Were the right engineers engaged? Were the right materials used? Was the original contract sum itself based on accurate, honest assessments of the ground conditions at Wales? Or was the project priced to win approval, with the real costs to be negotiated quietly, in the dark, after the cameras had moved on?
These are not paranoid questions. They are the only responsible questions to ask when US$97 million changes hands in secret, and the head of government lies about it.
A Project Built in Darkness
The Wales Gas-to-Energy project has never been clean. From its earliest days it has been wrapped in the kind of opacity that, in a country with functioning accountability institutions, would have triggered independent investigations, parliamentary inquiries, and sustained public pressure.
The project was oversold to the Guyanese people as the answer to the countryโs chronic energy crisis. Cheap electricity was the promise. Energy security was the vision. These were not small promises. In a nation where power outages remain a daily reality for thousands of households and businesses, the promise of reliable, affordable electricity is not a political slogan โ it is a lifeline. People built businesses around that promise. Communities organised their expectations around that timeline.
And yet, delay after delay, cost overrun after cost overrun, the project has consumed billions while delivering almost nothing to the ordinary Guyanese family still sitting in the dark. The original timeline has long since passed. The original budget has long since been breached. And now we learn that nearly one hundred million dollars more was paid out in a settlement that the Government initially denied even existed.
At what point does a pattern become a verdict?
This is not a project that hit unexpected difficulties and responded with transparency and accountability. This is a project that has operated from the beginning as though public scrutiny is an inconvenience to be managed rather than a right to be respected. Every uncomfortable question has been deflected. Every delay has been explained away. Every escalating cost has been dressed up in language designed to minimise rather than clarify.
And now, a Prime Minister caught in a lie does not resign. Does not offer a full accounting. Does not commission an independent review. He simply adjusts his language, softens his previous denial into something that might, at a distance, resemble a correction, and carries on.
The Cost of Looking Away
There will be those who say this is politics as usual. That all governments do this. That Guyanaโs development requires compromise, and that the energy project, whatever its flaws, is still necessary.
These arguments are the enemies of accountability, and they should be rejected with the firmness they deserve.
The argument that โall governments lieโ is not a defense of lying โ it is an admission that lying has become acceptable.
And in a young democracy, sitting on oil wealth that should be transforming lives across this country, the acceptance of that standard is not pragmatism. It is surrender. It is the surrender of every Guyanese who will never know exactly how much of their national inheritance was quietly settled away, in the dark, while their Prime Minister told them nothing was happening.
The argument that the project is โstill necessaryโ is a distraction. No one is suggesting that Guyana does not need energy infrastructure.
What is being demanded is that the money spent building that infrastructure is accounted for, honestly, in full, to the people who own it. A lie about US$97 million does not become acceptable because electricity is important. If anything, it becomes more dangerous โ because it tells contractors, consultants, and all those with their hands near the public purse that the cover of โnational developmentโ is wide enough to hide almost anything.
What Must Happen Now
This nation deserves more than a quiet walk-back and a percentage figure. It deserves answers.
Parliament must demand a full accounting of the Wales Gas-to-Energy project โ every contract, every amendment, every settlement, every payment. The DAAB award that triggered this US$97 million settlement must be made public in its entirety. The legal basis for the settlement, the names of those who negotiated it, and the chain of approvals that led to it must be placed before the Guyanese people.
The Prime Minister, having been caught in a deliberate public falsehood on a matter involving nearly one hundred million US dollars of public money, should not be permitted to simply move on. There must be consequences. If he was instructed to lie โ if this denial came from above โ then the public deserves to know that too. If it was his own decision, then the public deserves to know that just as much.
And President Irfaan Ali, who leads this Government and under whose watch this project has accumulated secret settlements, denied payments, and a Prime Minister who lied to the nation โ must speak. Not through a spokesperson. Not through a carefully worded press release. Directly, fully, and with the kind of accountability that the leader of an oil-rich democracy owes to its people.
The Wales Gas-to-Energy project was supposed to light up this country. Instead, it has illuminated something far darker โ a government that treats public money as its private affair, and public truth as an obstacle to be managed.
Mark Phillips lied. Ninety-seven million US dollars is missing from the honest public record of this country. And until this Government explains โ fully, openly, and without the shelter of percentages and careful language โ where that money went and why it was hidden, every Guyanese should treat every assurance from this administration with exactly the skepticism it has so thoroughly earned.
The light that this project promised Guyana is not the light of cheap electricity. It is the harsh, unflattering light of accountability. And it is long overdue.
๐๐๐ 592 ๐๐ช๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฃ ๐๐ง๐ช๐ฉ๐ ,๐ผ๐๐๐ค๐ช๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐ฉ๐ฎ, ๐๐ฃ๐ฉ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐ฎ ๐๐ฃ ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ผ๐ฃ๐ ๐พ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐๐๐ฃ ๐๐๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ. โ โฆโ
You must be logged in to post a comment.