The Balloon Squeeze
The Balloon Squeeze
OPINION BY : Hem Kumar September 2026
How a failed drug war became the biggest oil deal in history — and pushed the traffic our way
One year ago, the United States announced it had killed eleven people aboard a boat off the Venezuelan coast. The justification was drugs. There was no wreckage shown, no court, no named organization at first — only a Truth Social post and a video of an explosion at sea. President Trump called the dead “narco-terrorists.” The campaign that began with that strike now has a name, Operation Southern Spear, a body count exceeding 220, and an outcome its own architects did not advertise: it did not stop a single kilogram of cocaine from reaching the United States. It did, however, end with Washington holding a controlling stake in 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil, and with drug flights over Guyanese and Surinamese airspace rising as traffickers rerouted around it.
Both facts come from the record. Neither made it into President Trump’s account of his own foreign policy at the United Nations General Assembly this week, where he told the world the strikes had cut drug flows by 97 percent. His own Drug Enforcement Administration disagrees.
THE PRETEXT
The strikes began September 2, 2025, under the banner of interdiction. The legal theory was that the United States was in “armed conflict” with drug cartels, which meant the normal law-enforcement framework — interception, arrest, prosecution — could be replaced by summary lethal strikes in international waters, without congressional authorization and without the burden of proving, in any court, that the people killed were doing what they were accused of. Senator Jack Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said plainly at the time that the military was not “empowered to hunt down suspected criminals and kill them without trial.” The administration proceeded anyway.
By December, the total stood at 87 dead across 22 strikes. By the time reporters could compile a fuller account in the spring, more than twenty strikes had killed over 100 people. The pace never slowed. Following reports that the first strike had included a follow-on hit to kill survivors in the water, Congress opened an inquiry and summoned the Navy commander who had overseen the operation for classified briefings. The administration’s answer to skepticism was less evidence, not more: officials described “big bags of cocaine and fentanyl” spattered across the ocean after one strike, and released no images to support the claim.
Venezuela’s government denied throughout that it played any organizing role in the trafficking the strikes were meant to punish. American intelligence agencies, by multiple accounts, disputed the administration’s central claim that Nicolás Maduro’s government was directing Tren de Aragua and the drug trade themselves. One argument aired early and often, including by critics inside the security establishment: the true objective was not interdiction but regime change, with the drug war supplying the pretext oil politics alone could not.
THE ESCALATION
By October 2025 the campaign had outgrown its own justification. Strikes that began near the Venezuelan coast expanded into the wider Caribbean and the eastern Pacific, hitting boats near Colombia and Ecuador. Trump authorized covert CIA operations inside Venezuela. The military buildup in the region became, by multiple accounts, the largest in Latin America in decades; an aircraft carrier, F-35s, a nuclear submarine — and Trump began speaking openly of land strikes to come.
They came. In January 2026, U.S. forces struck inside Venezuela and captured Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. Within days, Trump was no longer talking about interdicting drug shipments. He was announcing that Venezuela’s new interim government, led by Delcy Rodríguez, would hand over 30 to 50 million barrels of oil to the United States — “to benefit the people,” he said, of both countries.
That was the opening bid. By August, it had grown by three orders of magnitude.
THE PAYOFF
On August 28, 2026, Trump announced what the White House called “the biggest oil deal in world history”: majority U.S. control of more than 65 billion barrels of Venezuela’s proven reserves. The structure, released days later, was not a direct state transfer Venezuela’s interim authorities granted North American Blue Energy Partners — a private company controlled by Venezuelan businessman Alejandro Betancourt, headquartered in Barbados; 100-year concessions across 17 oil fields. NABEP in turn gave the U.S. Office of Strategic Capital a 35 percent equity stake in its corporate parent, which the White House factsheet said represented “up to hundreds of billions in value and dividends for the United States.”
The fact-check arithmetic on Trump’s UN claim; that the U.S. and Venezuela together hold “more than 60 percent of the oil in the world” — is worth sitting with for what it reveals about the whole campaign’s rhetorical method, not just its inaccuracy. Venezuela’s proven reserves run to roughly 303 billion barrels; the U.S. holds about 46 billion. Together that is closer to 22 percent of global reserves, not 60. But the deeper distortion is upstream of the arithmetic: Trump described a 65-billion-barrel concession, routed through a private Barbadian holding company in which the U.S. holds a minority equity stake, as if it were sovereign American possession of the entire Venezuelan reserve base.
A year of strikes justified as narcotics enforcement produced, at the end of the line, a resource-access arrangement that the President Trump then rounded up to ownership of most of the world’s oil.
THE FAILURE AT THE CENTER OF IT
What the campaign did not produce is the part the administration has had to fight hardest to keep quiet. A Drug Enforcement Administration assessment, reported by the Washington Post in July and independently corroborated in a closed-door congressional briefing, found that the strikes had not moved the price, purity, or street availability of cocaine in the United States at any point in the year. Customs and Border Protection’s own seizure data showed cocaine volumes in the ten months after the strikes began were two percent higher than in the ten months before. Pentagon officials confirmed the same finding to the Senate Armed Services Committee. The current commander overseeing the operation has told Congress the boat strikes “aren’t the answer.”
What the strikes did produce was displacement, not deterrence. Traffickers abandoned the small “go-fast” boats that were the strikes’ preferred target, shifted to larger commercial vessels, moved closer to coastlines where the U.S. is less willing to fire, and increasingly turned to aircraft leaving clandestine airstrips on the Colombia-Venezuela border. According to the DEA’s own assessment, those flights now head east — to Guyana and Suriname.
“When you squeeze the balloon on one side, it always expands on the other side,” one DEA official told the Post. Guyana is where part of it expanded to.
WHAT THIS MEANS HERE
The 592 Guardian has documented separately the migration cooperation framework under which the United States is routing third-country deportees through Guyana, with the vetting process and accommodation arrangements undisclosed and no legislative framework governing any of it. That arrangement did not emerge in a vacuum. It sits inside a wider regional posture in which Washington has spent a year building the largest military presence in Latin America in generations, capturing a head of state, and converting the operation’s aftermath into a resource-access deal — all while the stated purpose of the campaign, drug interdiction, failed on every metric the government itself tracks.
Displaced trafficking routes are not an abstraction for a country sitting on the flight path traffickers have chosen specifically because it is harder for U.S. forces to reach. It is a regional security fact with a Guyanese address, generated by a policy Guyana had no part in shaping and was not consulted on. The oil deal’s optics — American equity in Venezuelan concessions, American forces reshaping Venezuelan governance — sit alongside the accelerating US-China positioning this media has tracked around the Berbice deepwater port and the Hess-Bechtel financing shift.
The timeline sharpens the point. On August 12, 2026, the United States signed an enhanced US$2 million security cooperation memorandum with Guyana for “air domain awareness and unmanned aerial systems,” announced by Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau and Foreign Minister Hugh Todd and framed publicly around organised crime and drug trafficking in general terms. No operational detail was disclosed — not the data-sharing architecture, not what triggered the timing, not why air surveillance specifically. That MoU was signed two weeks after the Washington Post’s report on the DEA’s internal assessment, which had already identified Guyana by name as a destination for trafficking flights displaced by the boat-strike campaign.
This publication has been unable to confirm operational linkage between the two — the administration has disclosed neither — but the sequence is no longer circumstantial enough to ignore, and it belongs in the same accountability file as the deportee framework: another arrangement whose real rationale was not the one stated in public, but was kept shrouded in secrecy .
None of this required Guyanese officials to say a word for it to reach Guyanese airspace. That, more than any single fact-check of a UN speech, is the story: a policy sold on one metric, justified after the fact by a different and much larger prize, whose actual costs are still being paid by the people standing nearest to the parts of it that failed.
Sources: The New York Times (Linda Qiu, Sept. 22, 2026); The Washington Post (Alex Horton, July 27, 2026, and Post opinion desk, July 28, 2026); NPR (Nov. 12, 2025; Jan. 7, 2026; July 28, 2026); Axios (Oct. 28, 2025); Britannica; Georgetown School of Foreign Service (Michael Shifter analysis); Bloomberg (Sept. 1, 2026); Foundation for Defense of Democracies (Sept. 2, 2026); Energy Connects; WOLA civil society letter (Sept. 2026); Fortune (Jan. 3, 2026); U.S.-Guyana Security Cooperation MoU, Aug. 12, 2026 (Landau/Todd).
Discover more from 592guardian.com
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!