๐ƒ๐จ๐งโ€™๐ญ ๐‚๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐Œ๐ž โ€” ๐”๐ง๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐˜๐จ๐ฎโ€™๐ซ๐ž ๐…๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฒ

When Home Affairs Minister Oneidge Walrond launched her now-infamous crackdown on tinted vehicles, she stood before the nation and told us what was meant to be a defining line in law enforcement reform:
โ€œ๐‘ซ๐’๐’โ€™๐’• ๐’„๐’‚๐’๐’ ๐’Ž๐’†.โ€ ๐‘ต๐’ ๐’‡๐’‚๐’—๐’๐’–๐’“๐’”, ๐’๐’ ๐’‘๐’‰๐’๐’๐’† ๐’„๐’‚๐’๐’๐’” ๐’•๐’ โ€œ๐’ƒ๐’Š๐’ˆ ๐’๐’๐’†๐’”.โ€ ๐‘ต๐’ ๐’†๐’™๐’„๐’†๐’‘๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’๐’” ๐’‡๐’๐’“ ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’˜๐’†๐’๐’-๐’„๐’๐’๐’๐’†๐’„๐’•๐’†๐’…. ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐’†๐’“๐’‚ ๐’๐’‡ ๐’”๐’†๐’๐’†๐’„๐’•๐’Š๐’—๐’† ๐’†๐’๐’‡๐’๐’“๐’„๐’†๐’Ž๐’†๐’๐’•, ๐’”๐’‰๐’† ๐’‘๐’“๐’๐’Ž๐’Š๐’”๐’†๐’…, ๐’˜๐’‚๐’” ๐’๐’—๐’†๐’“.
But Guyanese citizens are now left asking โ€” did she mean a word of it?
Because for days, social media has been flooded with footage showing a government-issued pickup โ€” a multimillion-dollar taxpayer-funded vehicle โ€” being hauled from a trench. The incident reportedly followed a night out, and according to multiple accounts, the driver was none other than Minister Walrondโ€™s own son. The videos show laughter and levity where accountability should have been.
And what has been the official response? Silence.
Not a word from the Ministry of Home Affairs. Not a statement from the police hierarchy, which operates under her authority. Not even an acknowledgment from the Minister herself โ€” despite journalists having put the question directly to her within the same Police Media Group she oversees.
If it were an ordinary citizen caught recklessly misusing public property, the Ministerโ€™s tint-crackdown swagger would have reappeared in full force. There would be arrests, charges, and public shaming. Instead, the institutions that exist to enforce standards seem paralyzed under proximity to power.
This is not just hypocrisy โ€” it is a constitutional distortion. The police, reportedly instructed to step back when she appeared at the scene, raise the troubling specter of executive interference.
๐‘พ๐’‰๐’†๐’ ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’๐’‡๐’‡๐’Š๐’„๐’Š๐’‚๐’ ๐’“๐’†๐’”๐’‘๐’๐’๐’”๐’Š๐’ƒ๐’๐’† ๐’‡๐’๐’“ ๐’๐’‚๐’˜ ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’๐’“๐’…๐’†๐’“ ๐’ƒ๐’†๐’๐’…๐’” ๐’•๐’‰๐’๐’”๐’† ๐’๐’‚๐’˜๐’” ๐’‡๐’๐’“ ๐’‘๐’†๐’“๐’”๐’๐’๐’‚๐’ ๐’„๐’๐’๐’—๐’†๐’๐’Š๐’†๐’๐’„๐’†, ๐‘ฎ๐’–๐’š๐’‚๐’๐’‚โ€™๐’” ๐’…๐’†๐’Ž๐’๐’„๐’“๐’‚๐’•๐’Š๐’„ ๐’Š๐’๐’”๐’•๐’Š๐’•๐’–๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’๐’” ๐’”๐’–๐’‡๐’‡๐’†๐’“ ๐’‚ ๐’˜๐’๐’–๐’๐’… ๐’‡๐’‚๐’“ ๐’…๐’†๐’†๐’‘๐’†๐’“ ๐’•๐’‰๐’‚๐’ ๐’‚๐’๐’š ๐’•๐’“๐’†๐’๐’„๐’‰.
So yes, letโ€™s address this anomaly โ€” this glaring betrayal of the โ€œOne Guyanaโ€ promise. The Minister of Home Affairs cannot credibly lead a ministry dedicated to impartial justice while selectively shielding her own family. The standards she demands of the public must extend to her household.
When it comes to Family, Friends, and Favourites, it seems the Ministry of Home Affairs has one unwritten rule: silence is the policy.
Reports identify the driver as the Home Affairs Ministerโ€™s son, allegedly after leaving a nightclub. What followed was not transparency, but a wall of silence thick enough to hide a scandal.
That silence raises urgent questions of public accountability:
โ€ข๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐š๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Œ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ซโ€™๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š ๐ฏ๐ž๐ก๐ข๐œ๐ฅ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐†๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐†๐ฎ๐ฒ๐š๐ง๐š? ๐“๐ก๐ž๐ฌ๐ž ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ญ๐จ๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐Ÿ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ž. ๐“๐ก๐ž๐ฒ ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐œ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ, ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ.
โ€ข๐–๐š๐ฌ ๐š ๐›๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐š๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐œ๐ž๐ง๐ž? ๐ˆ๐Ÿ ๐ฌ๐จ, ๐ฐ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ? ๐ˆ๐Ÿ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ, ๐ฐ๐ก๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐š๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐š๐ซ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐œ๐ž๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ซ๐ž๐ โ€” ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐œ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ณ๐ž๐ง ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐š๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ž๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐œ๐ก ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž?
โ€ข๐–๐š๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ ๐๐ž๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐š๐ค๐ž๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ง๐ž๐š๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐š๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐œ๐ž๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐๐ž๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐๐ฌ?
โ€ข๐€๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ฒ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐›๐š๐ฌ๐ข๐œ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐Œ๐ž๐๐ข๐š ๐†๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฉ โ€” ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Œ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž๐ซโ€™๐ฌ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฆ โ€” ๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐ฎ๐ง๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐?
It is difficult to avoid the stench of double standards. The same woman who spent the past year lecturing the public about responsibility, road safety, and accountability has gone mute when those principles touch her own doorstep.
Last year, at the launching of Road Safety Month, Minister Walrond warned against โ€œcarelessness, speed and distractionโ€ and pledged that even a single death caused by a drunk driver was โ€œone too many.โ€ She later stood beside a grieving mother at an event for victims of road accidents, her voice thick with empathy as she spoke of โ€œtragedies we have the power to prevent.โ€
In December, she thundered about transparency, promising to bring an end to the โ€œselective practices of the past.โ€
Today, those very words have returned to challenge her credibility. By allegedly interfering in the crash scene and remaining silent while the police hold their breath, she has done exactly what she accused others of doing โ€” bending the law for convenience and privilege.
๐‘ป๐’‰๐’Š๐’” ๐’Š๐’” ๐’๐’๐’• ๐’Ž๐’†๐’“๐’†๐’๐’š ๐’‚ ๐’Ž๐’‚๐’•๐’•๐’†๐’“ ๐’๐’‡ ๐’๐’‘๐’•๐’Š๐’„๐’”. ๐‘ฐ๐’• ๐’Š๐’” ๐’‚ ๐’’๐’–๐’†๐’”๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’ ๐’๐’‡ ๐’Š๐’๐’•๐’†๐’ˆ๐’“๐’Š๐’•๐’š ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’„๐’๐’๐’”๐’•๐’Š๐’•๐’–๐’•๐’Š๐’๐’๐’‚๐’ ๐’†๐’•๐’‰๐’Š๐’„๐’”.
When the Minister responsible for law and order fails to submit herself and her family to the same standards she is mandated to apply to ordinary citizens, she undermines every police officer, every prosecutor, and every citizen who still believes in equal justice under law.
No minister can credibly lead a portfolio dedicated to โ€œsafe, transparent, and enforceableโ€ governance while embodying the opposite.
The time for silence has passed. Minister Oneidge Walrond must go โ€” not because of the circulation of a video, but because she has forfeited the moral authority to lead. The peopleโ€™s desire is clear: Guyana deserves a Home Affairs Minister who serves the law, not one who bends it.
๐‘ฐ๐’‡ ๐’”๐’‰๐’† ๐’„๐’‚๐’๐’๐’๐’• ๐’–๐’‘๐’‰๐’๐’๐’… ๐’•๐’‰๐’‚๐’• ๐’‘๐’“๐’Š๐’๐’„๐’Š๐’‘๐’๐’†, ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’‰๐’๐’๐’๐’“๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’๐’† ๐’„๐’๐’–๐’“๐’”๐’† ๐’Š๐’” ๐’„๐’๐’†๐’‚๐’“: ๐‘ด๐’Š๐’๐’Š๐’”๐’•๐’†๐’“ ๐‘ถ๐’๐’†๐’Š๐’…๐’ˆ๐’† ๐‘พ๐’‚๐’๐’“๐’๐’๐’… ๐’Ž๐’–๐’”๐’• ๐’”๐’•๐’†๐’‘ ๐’…๐’๐’˜๐’.
๐™๐™๐™š 592 ๐™‚๐™ช๐™–๐™ง๐™™๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ โ€” ๐™๐™ง๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™ , ๐˜ผ๐™˜๐™˜๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ, ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™œ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™„๐™ฃ ๐™‚๐™ช๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™—๐™—๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ

161 Billion for Health, but None for Marlon

When the government boasted of a record $161.1 billion allocation to the health sector this year, it was sold to the nation as an affirmation of progress โ€” gleaming hospitals, high-tech diagnostics, and a promise that โ€œall Guyaneseโ€ would benefit from improved healthcare delivery. Yet, as a nation, we stand today in collective mourning.
Twelve-year-old Marlon Jupiter is dead โ€” gone before his time โ€” because the state that swore to protect him could not find $7 million to save his life.
Marlon suffered from T-lymphoblastic lymphoma, a rare but treatable cancer. The care he needed did not exist in Guyana. His family, like so many others before them, turned to the public with desperation โ€” social media pleas, bake sales, and appeals for help. While they struggled to raise US$35,000, the government was signing off on hundreds of millions in discretionary allocations: $900 million for โ€œMen on a Mission,โ€ $300 million for the Office of the President, and untold sums for lavish conferences, diplomatic missions, and โ€œconsultations.โ€
In a budget where individual kickbacks can exceed $7 million, it is a national disgrace that a child was forced to die for want of that same amount.
What value do mounds of concrete and air-conditioned wards carry when life-saving treatment remains beyond reach? Of what use are billion-dollar budgets when their impact cannot be measured in the preservation of a single innocent life? This country continues to exhibit a pathology of misaligned priorities โ€” where optics eclipse substance, where monuments matter more than lives, and where political showpieces are dressed up as โ€œinvestments in health.โ€
When โ€œhealthcareโ€ is invoked to justify building promenades for private hospitals and expanding vanity projects under the First Ladyโ€™s fund, we see what truly drives the expenditure: image management, not human welfare. The Constitution guarantees free healthcare, but โ€œfreeโ€ means nothing when it is hollow โ€” when fundamental care is missing, and when bureaucracy and neglect replace compassion and responsiveness.
Marlonโ€™s death is not just a tragedy. It is an indictment. It represents criminal negligence by a state that failed to deploy its resources toward their constitutional purpose โ€” the preservation of life.
Every public dollar misused or hoarded for politics is a moral crime, costing lives like Marlonโ€™s. A governmentโ€™s greatness is not measured by how many hospitals it builds but by how many lives its health system can save โ€” in real time, when help is needed most.
Rest easy, young Marlon. You deserved better.
And to those in power: your legacy will be judged not by the floodlights on new infrastructure, but by the number of children who lived to see adulthood because you chose compassion over vanity.